<< 2010
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
< mar apr may >
[April, 2010]


TAKING A BREAK
04.16.2010

It's hard to believe, but I've posted at least one blog post per week now for 3 years running!  

Now it's time for me to take a break. I've never been busier in my entire life than I am right now, both personally and professionally.  

Every minute I spend on this blog is a minute of attention that my family isn't getting, my clients aren't getting, and those darn overgrown weeds all around my house aren't getting.

Something has to give, so I'm cutting back on blogging for now. I'm not stopping entirely, but expect maybe one post a month rather than once a week.  Don't bother checking it every day - please just subscribe via the RSS feed and you'll know when there's new material here.

I'm still continuing with the workshops.

One-on-one workshops can be done:

  • in-person in Seattle
  • over the phone
  • via Skype


My next live group workshop is the May 22 "Starting a Profitable Wedding Business" workshop in Seattle. Seats are still available.

Laurence Kim Workshops

 


7 comments
 hide
 view
Scott Roeben: OK, enough with the break time already! My photography is suffering. (07/06/10, 05:39)     
Shamima Sultana: wow..very nice photography... thanks for sharing this (06/28/10, 02:16)     
Tammy Sullivan: And a well deserved break is in order!  Enjoy the famiy and get going on those weeds!  (05/04/10, 03:32)     
Alan: Can´t wait for the May 22nd Workshop, so excited!! Where is it going to be?? (05/04/10, 01:28)     
Kris: Awwwww, say it aint true. (05/04/10, 03:04)     
solaris9000: Hi Laurence. I think you have a superb site full of info and I have learnt a lot from it. I understand your decision and look forward to your future posts. Keep up the good work. (05/03/10, 01:34)     
Sebastian: Dear Mr. Kim, dear Laurence, it´s a pitty that you want to reduce the time you are spending on your blog. Every article was a breeze, showing what is possible, how and ecouraging us to go beyond our limits, even as amateurs. I´ve enjoyed every post and will continue doing so - if it is one per month, ok, that´s life. I understand your motivation to keep time for your real life. Nevertheless you might have time for two or three posts in some months ;) Thx for your input so far! And greetings to your beautiful family! (05/03/10, 08:39)     
PERMALINK SEND TO A FRIEND ADD A COMMENT
more: potpourri




FORMAL FAMILY PORTRAIT
04.06.2010

As a lifestyle photographer, it's not often that I get hired to do formal family portraits. However, when I do them, I enjoy the challenge.

Here's my thought process behind a recent family formal portrait.

  • Subjects:  parents + their 2 adult children and one of their spouses
  • Selecting the background: the parents live right on the Puget Sound. The grounds are immaculate - the grass almost looks like a putting green. I knew the background had to be the view from the backyard - no real discussion here, this one was obvious.
  • The pose:  most photographers would probably set up a shot like this:

 

Now there's nothing wrong with this shot. If I had to shoot 30 family formals in 30 minutes (like at a wedding) I'd probably shoot something like this.  But the problem is that there is no concept behind the shot.  It's just a bunch of people standing in a row.

I wanted to do something more interesting. If the client does not have a particular concept in mind, then I just make one up of my own.

My concept for this shot: I imagined that this was, say, a family that ran a prominent business and a story about their lavish estate was being run in Town & Country Magazine.  I wanted a more 3 dimensional pose, which showed them in a more interesting and relaxing setting.
Here's my diagram of the final shot:
I set up two lawn chairs, one about 3 feet closer than the other, and placed the parents in the chairs. Then the "kids" went behind them. I wanted everyone to be relaxed, yet still in a more formal position than you'd typically see in one of my lifestyle portraits.

Using these chairs gave me 3 levels to work with: sitting on the chair, sitting on the arm, and standing. Placing the 2nd chair 3 feet behind the first adds a 4th level.  These levels contribute to the depth of the image.

The key, however, to any family portrait (formal or lifestyle) is to show the closeness of the family members, which is why I made sure they were touching each other. The smiles came from me just joking around with them.

Here's the final image. No Photoshop was required - this is straight from Lightroom.



Here are the technicals for the shot:

(1) Set the camera on manual mode, evaluative (matrix) metering.  I used the following as a default setting:  ISO 100, f8, 1/200 sec.  Camera was a Canon 5D with 70-200mm lens @ 70mm.

(2) Take a test shot, view histogram to judge exposure. In this case, my initial settings were just fine. It gave me about -1 stop of exposure, just where I wanted it. Why underexpose the ambient light by one stop? Two reasons: it really turns the sky a nice blue on a sunny day or makes the clouds more dramatic on a cloudy day. Second, it will really make your subjects pop out when lit with off camera flash.

(3)  My 580exII flash was on a stand to camera right. I did not use any umbrella or softbox. This was just straight, direct flash. Why no umbrella? To be honest, it was simply too windy to use an umbrella. However, because I had my flash pulled back some distance away from my subjects (to cover all of them without any significant light falloff between the nearest and farthest person), an umbrella would only have made a minor difference anyway.

(4)  I set my flash on manual mode, 1/2 power and took a test shot. It was slightly underexposed so I bumped up the power a bit, but I was still less than full power.

(5)  I kneeled down on one knee to get a low camera angle and fired away. I took about 6 shots from this position. Remember that a low camera angle always adds drama and power to a shot. Taken at eye level this shot would not have been nearly as interesting. Get down on that knee!

That's pretty much it.  When I opened the image in Lightroom, exposure was perfect. I did not have to move the exposure slider at all. The only thing I did was add a tiny bit of sharpening. Remember that a sharp lens, f8, and perfect light all contribute to an image that's already going to be sharp.


                            Laurence Kim Workshops

May 22, Seattle, Starting a Profitable Wedding Business, seats available
  

10 comments
 hide
 view
Yohan Maltais : Often, on your blog, you preach the positive compensation not the negative. Is there a very big diference between no compensation at all?  Did you decided right for the first shot that you\´ll use negative compensation?  (08/16/10, 12:16)     
Bernd: wonderful family portrait! it totally works, the toughing, the laughing, the layered depth. thank you for sharing your knowledge.  (05/04/10, 05:19)     
Sarasota Portrait Photographer: Nicely done, thanks for the great tutorial. Always good stoping by. I really like your second shot. Natascha (05/02/10, 04:44)     
Anonymous: Thanks for the tutorial!  Your posts are ALWAYS insightful and theres always something to take away from them. Just wondering, for me the hardest part is the joking around part.  How do you get them to show such lavish smiles?  What did you say to them?  How can I seek improvement in this area?  (05/01/10, 10:30)     
Nicole: Wow great shot! So sharp. Looks fantastic. (04/22/10, 01:34)     
mrssalman: That was a great tips. I just found your blog. Its really helpful for me to brush up my skills in photographing. Thanks (04/18/10, 03:24)     
Colorado Wedding Photographer, JasonG: Great post... I´m always looking for interesting ways to create nice (not boring) formals. Thanks for including the before and after shot - such a dramatic difference.  (04/15/10, 06:54)     
Laurence Kim: @Brence, f8 at a distance of 35-40 will give you plenty of dof. According to every online dof calculator I could find, dof at those settings is about 49 feet! (15.04.2010 ,13:34)     
Dennis: Hi Laurence, I don´t do photography professionally but I enjoy your post very much. I learned a lot from you. I love your blog and follows them closely. This post was fantastic. That is why I added you to my rss feeds. Just to let you know that your whole post was showed in the feed. If that was your decision then its alright. It would not have made a difference if you dont mind readers not visiting your site. But if you want them to go to your site, then maybe you should just show an excerpt on your feed so that your readers would have to visit your blog for the full post. :-) Best Regards Dennis from Phuket. (04/15/10, 02:57)     
Brence: Thanks for sharing Laurence. There certainly is an art to arranging a group of people for a portrait. Regarding focus and depth of field; even at 70mm, f/8 has a fairly shallow depth of field. Where did you focus to ensure that you keep everyone in the image sharp? In this example your subjects are staggered backwards across maybe 4-5 feet, which I would have thought would have been more than you would have had at f/8?  (04/14/10, 06:57)     
PERMALINK SEND TO A FRIEND ADD A COMMENT
more: tutorials




infos
Topics posted: 162
Comments posted: 1154
Total visits: 947154
SEARCH: 
GO
RSS feed

© Laurence Kim Photography, all rights reserved. blog by flosites