We started out with a dramatic hair/makeup change by the fabulous Dawn Tunnell.

While we were changing hair and makeup a bridal party and photographer marched past us down the meadow. I thought they were doing bridal portraits but as it turned out it was an actual wedding ceremony.

Then Dawn and my assistant Paige held up this blanket for a make-shift dressing room.

We were going for the bride-of-Frankenstein look. Here's what we got:

Image #1 was lit, and the other two were natural light. In this post I sang the praises of the Alien Bees, saying how in the past 4 years they've never failed on me. Well, the AB800 I brought with me finally did. Just died. So all of our lighting on this shoot was done with the backup, a plain old Canon 580exII with a 60" umbrella.

The last few frames of the day we may have lost our minds.

Shelby and John got engaged at Gasworks Park, so that's where they wanted to go for their portraits. (note to photographers: this is an almost identical shot to the one from my tutorial below on shooting in midday sun.)

John found this football and put Shelby to work. Not too shabby a throw...

A few minutes later we came upon a photographer doing a fashion shoot with a model. She was nice enough to show us a few poses...

We stumbled upon a large gathering of nudists. We met Richard The Naked Guy, who took some time out of his busy day to pose for a snapshot.

Next on our agenda was a brief stop at Dick's Drive In for some shakes. When we got there, a boatload (literally) of pirates jumped out of their ship and grabbed Shelby and John for this picture.

The rest of the wedding was less eventful, but still beautiful.

You can look for shade, but what if there isn't any? You can try overpowering the sun with your flash. With on-camera flash, this looks pretty terrible. It might be cool if you have some radio poppers and an assistant so you can use off-camera flash with high-speed sync, but what if that isn't an option?

The answer is simple - just put your subject in-between your camera and the sun. Unless you live on the equator, even at midday the sun is at a slight angle, not directly overhead. Just make a straight line using three points - the sun, then your subject, then you. Your subjects' faces will be in shade and the sun directly behind them will make a nice rim light.

This portrait was taken on July 13, 2008 at 12:15pm. Blazing sun, not a cloud in the sky. (Canon 5D w/70-200mm f2.8L IS lens @200mm, ISO 200, f4.5, 1/800 sec, +0 EC):

The proofs are what my clients see when they're deciding which images to order. It's only after the order is placed that the image gets the full workup in Photoshop. There are a few things I want to note here:

- Never show your clients straight-out-of-the-camera images. You're a professional, so you should always be showing your clients great looking images. You can't say, "don't worry, these images haven't been color corrected - they'll look great when you get them." Sorry, that's lame. Your clients paid for a professional product, so they should see professionally presented images right from the start.

- On the other hand, fully retouching every image is a quick road to bankruptcy. There aren't enough hours in the day to do this, and even if there were, other aspects of your business and life would suffer. For a typical portrait shoot, I'll fully retouch a handful of images to show the client what to expect for the finished product. Then I'll give the full treatment to every image that they actually order.

- I do all my proof work using Lightroom. There are many great tools for proofing - LR, Aperture, Bridge/ACR, C1, etc. Don't use Photoshop for preparing proofs - it will take you 5x longer.

Using LR, I pretty much work from top down on the "Develop" panel.

See these boxes in the upper corners of the historgram? Make sure you click on them to make them active. When you do this any clipped highlights will show up as red and clipped shadows will show up as blue.

Okay, now I'll take you through my start-to-finish process on an actual image from my last wedding. This is the image straight out of the camera. (Canon 5D w/24mm f1.4L lens, no flash, ISO 1600, f2.2, 1/500 sec, +0 EC)

Step 1: Adjust white balance to taste. This image is slightly warm and magenta to my taste, so I moved the Temp slider to the left (from 4450 to 3754) and the Tint slider also to the left (from -2 to -11). Keep in mind that white balance is a matter of taste. Some photographers like slightly warm images, but I prefer mine to be on the neutral side.

Step 2: Next I adjust the white point (exposure). In this case, the image is a bit underexposed. I moved the exposure slider to the right a half-stop (+0.49). I would have liked to move the exposure even more, but the dress was completely blowing out and losing all detail. I know this because half the dress is covered with red blotches, showing highlight clipping. To bring back the dress detail, I had to also move the "recovery" slider to +30.

Step 3: Set your black point. Here I moved the "blacks" slider to 6. This improves the contrast. At 6, I'm just starting to see a few blue blotches in the bride's hair. That's fine. If you don't see any blue blotches at all, that means you have no true blacks in your image, and it probably looks washed-out.

Step 4: I'm going slightly out of order here. In this step I went down to the "Tone Curve" box and switched the curve from "linear" to "medium contrast". This gives the curve a slight "S" shape and adds contrast to the image. In reality, my normal pre-set I use when importing images into Lightroom already does this for me.

Step 5: Give the image a final tweak using the brightness and contrast sliders. The exposure slider is the one that should do the heavy lifting regarding the brightness of your image. The brightness slider is puts on the final touch. It primarily adjuts the mid tones.

Step 6: For portraits I usually apply a bit of a vignette to focus the attention on my subject. It always cracks me up on internet forums when posters review lenses and complain about vignetting. I add vignetting to most of my images! Anyway, vignetting controls are in the "lens corrections" box:

Step 7: Sharpen. I sharpen with a Photoshop action that I run when I export the images from Lightroom. I don't sharpen until I've corrected all of my images. Then when exporting them all I run a sharpening action as a droplet so I never have to physically open up the images in Photoshop. Saves a ton of time.

And here's the "before" image again for comparison:

That's it! The entire process takes me about 30-40 seconds. If your subject doesn't need extensive retouching, preparing the images for proofing might be all you ever need to do. Sometimes I've prepared an image in Lightroom, then later given it the full Monty in Photoshop - only to find that I prefered the original, clean proof! Your proofs should look better than any images your client has ever seen - then be prepared to totally blow them away when they see their images in their fully-Photoshopped goodness!

Check out Laura's shoes. I have some pretty cool brides, eh?

The guys polished off this bottle of Crown Royal before the ceremony, amazingly without any visible effect.

In a total surprise to Laura and Dustin (and to me too), Elvis made an appearance at the ceremony, belting out "Can't Help Falling in Love".

He did it! No, she did!

Dustin and Elvis gave a little performance at the end of the evening...

We stopped by this cupcake shop and they couldn't resist...

A shot for their album cover...

Tech notes:

1) Canon 5D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS @200mm, ISO 400, f3.5, 1/1000 sec, EC +1/3

2) Canon 5D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS @200mm, ISO 400, f3.2, 1/320 sec, EC +1/3

3) Canon 5D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS @200mm, ISO 500, f3.5, 1/1600 sec, EC +1/3

4) Canon 5D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS @200mm, ISO 500, f5.0, 1/250 sec, EC +1/3

5) Canon 30D, 35mm f/1.4L, ISO 400, f4.5, 1/640 sec, EC 0

6) Canon 30D, 35mm f/1.4L, ISO 400, f7.1, 1/500 sec, EC +1/3

7) Canon 5D, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS @200mm, ISO 500, f3.2, 1/2000 sec, EC +1/3

8) Canon 5D, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS @200mm, ISO 500, f3.5, 1/1000 sec, EC +1/3

9) Canon 30D, 35mm f/1.4L, ISO 400, f3.5, 1/640 sec, EC +2/3

As you can tell, I just loooove my 70-200. It's tack sharp and just makes everything look so great. You'll have to pry this lens off of my cold, dead hands! The 35mm 1.4L is my next favorite lens - incredibly sharp, great color and contrast, and perfect as a moderate wide angle on a full frame body or a normal lens on a crop camera.

Before...

and after...

Before...

after...

And for my guest chairs I selected these cool Herman Miller Eames chairs...

Note to photographers: It's really important to invest your money in the right places if you want your business to thrive. Do you really need that 45mm TS-E, that D3 or that latest set of Photoshop plug-ins? Investments in your sales area and product samples will make you way more money than a fancy new camera or lens ever will.

ETTR means that you are exposing your images higher than what your camera's meter considers "correct" (i.e. you are slightly overexposing your images). This captures the most image data your camera's sensor can record. In practice, that means adjusting your exposure on your subject so that your histogram goes as far to the right of the chart as possible without blowing out (clipping) your subject. Notice that I say "subject", because blowing out the background usually isn't a problem for most portrait situations. Many emerging photographers take pains to avoid blowing out any part of an image, and that's a mistake. Who really cares if that light fixture contains any highlight detail? It's more important that your subject is properly exposed.

Here is an example (from a bandw image) of what I mean by making sure your histogram goes all the way to the right. This is proper exposure:

And here's an example of an underexposed image - the chart falls far short of the right edge:

Yes, the image can be "fixed" by moving the exposure slider to the right in Lightroom or adjusting levels in Photoshop, but when you do so the image quality is degraded and the final results much less pleasing than if the image were properly exposed in the camera. The more you need to move the exposure sliders on the computer, the more muddy (noisy) your image will become.

Here are a few principles to consider first:

(1) DO NOT trust the image in your camera's LCD screen as a judge of proper exposure. Even when shooting raw, the image on your LCD is an in-camera jpeg that has been processed by your camera's computer. If the image is underexposed, the algorithm in the camera's jpeg processing will boost the levels. This may make the image look fine on the LCD screen, while being dramatically underexposed in practice. Only use your camera's histogram to judge exposure.

(2) Think about your metering mode. Over the years I've found that I get my most reliable results using the evaluative metering mode (known as matrix metering for you Nikon users). This averages out the exposure for the entire scene. I'm not saying this is the only way to go - there are many photographers who successfully use the center-weighted or spot metering mode. However, I shoot lots of weddings, corporate events, and small children. In all of these situations, I have to move quickly with not a lot of time to set up shots. Evaluative metering gives me the most margin for error. If you are even slightly off with spot metering (or your camera gets fooled) you could end up with an unusable image.

(3) Know how to use your exposure compensation (EC) dial. When using automatic metering such as aperture-priority, using EC will override the camera's metering. When using manual metering, EC means setting the exposure so the needle is not in the center of the grid, but either left or right depending on your judgement.

Now I'm going to run through my decision making process from some actual shoots (you may recognize some of the images from some recent blot posts). In this image, I'm using aperture-priority mode and Evaluative metering. The camera is a Canon 30D with a 24mm f1.4L lens. ISO 400, f1.8, 1/100 sec, +1.33 EC:

(1) The first thing I do before I shoot is to set my camera's ISO. In this image I used ISO 400. From experience I pretty much know exactly what ISO I need to be at. When shooting indoors, I never go below ISO 400. I usually start at 400 and see what my settings are. Most often I'm shooting at 800 or even 1600. Don't be afraid to boost your ISO. A little noise in an image is okay, but getting a blurry image from motion blur or camera shake is not. With today's cameras, noise at ISO 800 is pretty much a non-issue.

(2) The next thing I do is to set my aperture. In this image I used f1.8. At ISO 400, I needed a fast (wide open) aperture to get an acceptable shutter speed. I also like shooting with large apertures due to the limited depth of field it gives me. It's a look that clients can't get themselves with their point and shoot cameras - or even with their consumer SLR cameras with kit lenses.

(3) Okay, here's the key part - setting the exposure compensation. In this image, you'll notice light coming in from behind and to the left of my subjects. The walls are also white. So the bulk of this scene is much brighter than the subjects themselves. I know that I'm going to need +EC. I moved my EC dial to the right until I was at +1.33 EC. In other words, I overrode my camera's evaluation of the scene by 1 and 1/3 stops. In practice, this means that the aperture setting I selected, the camera reduced its shutter speed from about 1/250 to 1/100. As it turns out, even this wasn't enough. I ended up having to increase the exposure by yet another 1/2 stop in Lightroom, so I really needed about +2 EC. However, a half-stop move in Lightroom produces quite an acceptable image, while a 2 stop correction would definitely have resulted in a muddy image. I could have taken a few test shots to dial-in the exact exposure, but in this fast-moving situation, it was more important that I capture the moment, so setting the camera at +1.33 EC was just a quick estimate that worked out well in practice.

(4) Is any part of this image "blown-out" because I exposed to the right? Yes, the light reflecting off the floor in the bottom left corner of the image is blown out. Do I care about that? Not at all.

Here's another example from a wedding I shot last Saturday. Canon 5D w/24mm f1.4L lens, ISO 1250, f1.6, 1/100 sec, +1.67 EC:

(1) ISO was set to 1250. Despite the bright light coming from the window, this hotel room was very dark - particularly in the direction the bride is facing. I needed at least ISO 1000 or more in order to have a fast enough shutter speed to get a sharp image.

(2) Using aperture priority mode, aperture was set to f1.6. Again, because of the very dark room I needed a fast aperture to get an acceptable shutter speed.

(3) EC was set to +1.67. With the very bright windows behind the bride (and thus greatly affecting the camera's exposure reading) I knew I needed to compensate with adding plenty of positive EC. As in the previous example, I needed to make a half-stop move to the right in Lightroom, so the correct EC would have been +2.33. However, in this fast-moving environment getting it within a half stop was quite acceptable.

(4) Notice that the windows are totally blown out. Not only does this not bother me at all, I actually like it. It wraps the light around my subjects and creates an ethereal look. In my camera's LCD screen, I saw that the windows were blinking black, telling me that they were blown out.

A subject doesn't have to be back-lit to require +EC. In this image, this adorable little girl is being side-lit by a window camera right. She's standing in front of a bright yellow wall, which brightens the overall scene, in turn underexposing my subect, so the image required +1EC to get proper exposure. Canon 30D w/24mm f1.4L lens, ISO 800, f2.0, 1/200 sec, +1EC:

Here is a situation that most photographers wouldn't think to add +EC. It's an outdoor image on an overcast day. You can't get much more even lighting than a very cloudy day, right? There's light coming from all directions, right? Yet even in this situation, the image required +1EC. That's because much of the image is comprised of the sky, which - although cloudy - is still much brighter than the subjects. Remember, any time there is a very bright element in the frame you're subjects are likely to be underexposed without adding +EC. Canon 30D w/24mm f1.4L lens, ISO 100, f7.1, 1/125 sec, +1 EC:

Summary:

When indoors, my default camera setting is +.67 EC. The only time I take my camera into a neutral EC setting is when I'm dealing with a front-lit subject on a bright day, or if I'm shooting with off-camera strobes. Adding +EC moves your exposure to the right (ETTR), which captures the most image data and produces crisp images. You can use +EC regardless of whether you're using aperture priority in combination with the EC dial, or whether you shoot manual and just meter with the needle to the right.

Do I ever use negative EC? Almost never. If I were shooting, say, a groom and his groomsmen with dark skin wearing dark suits in a room with dark walls then -EC would be necessary. I've shot 1,500 frames at some weddings without needing to use -EC even once.

Practice ETTR and I guarantee you'll get crisper, cleaner images!

Ceremony: Church of Saint Thomas the Apostle

Reception: Walker Art Center

Florist: Flora Bella

Caterer: Wolfgang Puck Catering

Band: Pop Luxe

Planner: Geri Wolf

Now turn your computer speakers up loud, and click below to view the slideshow.

[object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="790" height="600" id="showit_swf" data="http://www.laurencekim.com/brennajohn/showit.swf"][param name="movie" value="http://www.laurencekim.com/brennajohn/showit.swf" /][param name="flashvars" value="showit_embed=http://www.laurencekim.com/brennajohn/|790|600|1|1|0" /][param name="wmode" value="transparent" /][param name="salign" value="LT" /][param name="menu" value="false" /][param name="loop" value="false" /][param name="quality" value="best" /][param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /][/object]

Oh, and I almost forgot to mention that Brenna's dad is my new idol - check out his bathroom!

(image courtesy of iStockphoto)

I'm going to start this entry by posting my favorite image of the day - this one's going on my website:

In a nice regional touch, the party favors were these umbrellas - thankfully we didn't need them.

I loved Brenna's dress - simple and elegant.

When Brenna told me she was doing her own hair and makeup, I was skeptical - but of course it turned out great!

Getting the dress on unleashed the floodgates from her friend and mom.

Brenna's dad cleared a field from the woods, then built this pagoda for his little girl's wedding. He even installed a small propane heater (under the white cover) in case it was chilly. Is that a father's love?

A big hug for baby brother.

The house is practically a wildlife sanctuary. There were bird feeders everywhere.

The food was without a doubt the best I've had at a wedding in a long, long time. My good friend Lesa Welcker of Lulabean custom cakes and cookies designed this gorgeous carrot cake. It was so moist it practically melted in my mouth...

The mind-boggling Japanese food was catered by Hiroshi Egashira. His restaurant, Hiroshis, is in Seattle. I plan on taking MaryBeth there soon!

John's peanut gallery (his musician buddies from Boston).

Brenna's girls.

We ended the day with a 5 minute mini-fashion shoot.

Check back here in a week or so for the slideshow!

(1) less rain in the winter and

(2) have more brides do bridal shoots!

It seems like in the south almost every bride does a bridal shoot while in Seattle almost none do! And why not? You've paid a lot of money for that dress, spent a lot of time on the fittings, and you only get to wear it for one day? It's also a great opportunity to try out your makeup and dress to make sure it really fits.

Anyway, so I set up my own bridal shoot with the lovely Yulia. Makeup and hair were done by the fabulously talented Dawn Tunnell.

Here are the first few from the session - more to come:

Tech (all shots taken with a Canon 5D):

(1) 24mm f1.4L, ISO 160, f9, 1/200 sec, 580exII w/60" umbrella, full power

(2) 85mm f1.8, ISO 200, f3.5, 1/500 sec, no strobe or reflector

(3) 85mm f1.8, ISO 160, f7.1, 1/200 sec, 580exII w/60" umbrella, full power

(4) 85mm f1.8, ISO 200, f3.5, 1/250 sec, no strobe or reflector

I sat down with Michelle Engvall, one of Seattle's top wedding planners, and asked her for her view on weddings and wedding planning.

LK: How did you get into event planning?

ME: Event planning found me! Ever since I was a kid I've been the one in the family to organize birthday parties, holidays and play dates. I went on to plan corporate events for Expedia.com and Microsoft, but weddings have always been my passion.

LK: What's the best thing about being an event planner?

ME: I truly love my job! Being a part of the most important day in my clients' lives is an honor. I enjoy getting to know them and often times building lasting friendships. When the wedding day arrives the emotion of seeing their family and friends and the love of the couple makes every amount of work worth it and so much more.

LK: What are some common misconceptions about hiring a planner?

ME: In years past hiring a planner was viewed as a luxury for the wealthy, but today a planner is more of a necessity for any wedding size or budget. Even the most organized bride needs a planner at her wedding so she can breathe and know that everything is being taken care of.

Another misconception is that hiring a planner is a large additional expense. It's not. Having a planner from the beginning can actually save most couples money. Planners not only can offer discounts with select vendors but are experts at budget management and pairing you with the highest quality vendors without breaking the bank.

Lastly, a planner saves time by tracking all the details and is a mediator between you and your vendors. You only take part in what you want, like tasting the cake, listening to bands or perusing through photographers' albums. Hiring a planner won't take away any of the fun!

LK: What are some of the biggest mistakes you've seen couples make when planning a wedding?

ME: Communication! From the beginning set realistic goals for your wedding and make sure you both agree on the overall vision. Just as important is the big budget conversation. Tense situations surrounding the budget can be alleviated up front by talking openly to family and each other about where the money will come from, what the budget is and how they can make their dollars spread across the different vendors. Lastly, don't get caught up in too many details and forget what your wedding represents - a long and happy marriage together!

LK: If you weren't a planner, you'd be a...

ME: ...an elementary school teacher. I love kids and am told I have the patient demeanor for the job. Now I just look forward to having my own kids...down the road. I am practicing with my boxer-lab mix Harley that my husband Andrew and I rescued last year!

LK: thanks, Michelle!

My trusty assistant Paige...

Tech notes:

1) 5D w/85mm f1.8 lens, ISO 100, f8, 1/200, large softbox

2) 30D w/50mm f1.4 lens, ISO 100, f8, 1/200, ring flash

3) 30D w/50mm f1.4 lens, ISO 100, f8, 1/200, ring flash

4) 5D w/85mm f1.8 lens, ISO 100, f3.2, 1/640, silver reflector

5) 5D w/70-200 f2.8L IS lens @200mm, ISO 200, f3.5, 1/400 no flash or reflector

6) 5D w/70-200 f2.8L IS lens @95mm, ISO 200, f3.5, 1/1250, silver reflector

7) 5D w/85mm f1.8 lens, ISO 200, f1.8, 1/1600, no flash or reflector

8) 5D w/70-200 f2.8L IS lens @153mm, ISO 200, f2.8, 1/1600, no flash or reflector

9) 5D w/85mm f1.8 lens, ISO 200, f2.2, 1/160, no flash or reflector